Today, we are going to look at two phrases that people often struggle to use correctly: despite and in spite of. Read on if you want to find out how to use them.
First of all, let’s look at the similarities. Look at these two complex sentences:
Is there any difference in meaning between them?
No! They actually mean the same thing.
“Despite” and “in spite of” are both subordinating conjunctions that tell us about the relationship between the ideas in the two clauses of the sentence. It means that what happened in the main clause happened without being affected by whatever is mentioned in the subordinate clause.
Here is another example:
These people went for a walk but that is surprising because of the rain. However, the rain did not stop them from walking, so we can use “despite” or “in spite of.”
We have seen that these two phrases have the same basic meaning and can be used interchangeably. However, let’s look at them in more detail.
Look at these sentences:
Here, we can see that both terms can be used before a noun. This is actually very common.
Similarly, they can be used in front of a gerund (which is a verb turned into a noun and is used in the “-ing” form).
If we want to use an independent clause, we need to remember that “despite” and “in spite of” are both subordinating conjunctions, so there needs to be a modification made. Let’s take this clause as an example:
We cannot say “despite it was dark outside” or “in spite of it was dark outside.” These would be completely incorrect.
Therefore, we need to modify both phrases with “the fact that”:
You can see we have simply put a noun after “despite” and “in spite of,” then modified that noun with a relative clause.
People often write “despite of” when they are learning English, but this is completely incorrect. It is simply a case of someone mixing together “despite” and “in spite of,” creating a new phrase. However, we cannot do this.
For example, this is completely incorrect:
Instead, we should say:
As you can see, we can simply replace “despite of” with one of the two phrases that it mixed together.
We have now seen two common mistakes that people make when trying to use “despite” and “in spite of,” but there are more.
These words tend to be confused with other subordinating conjunctions. For example, we can see that “although” has a loosely similar meaning:
People might be tempted to use “despite” here instead of “although.” However, it would require a change:
Again, we can see how we need to present a noun, then modify it with a relative clause. Essentially, what was the whole of the first clause is now a relative clause.
The same is true with “even though”:
To use “despite,” we must change the form a little:
I've been teaching IELTS since 2010 and I've marked many thousands of essays as part…
I'm finally making videos again after a very long absence from YouTube! I hardly made…
In today’s grammar lesson, I want to show you how to make lists. I don’t…
I just posted a new video on my YouTube channel. This one is about comma…
I have given lessons on sentence types before on this website because it's such an…
In the IELTS exam, you could be asked a question related to health and for…
View Comments
Hi, I am so curious with the use of 'despite', 'inspite of', and 'due to' as subordinating conjunctions. If they are subordinators they usually are followed by a clause while 'inspite of' and 'despite' are followed by a phrase. Could you explain this?