In today’s grammar lesson, we are going to learn all about participle clauses. I will show you what a participle clause is, how to form one, and how to avoid common errors.
A participle clause is a group of words containing a present, past, or perfect participle, whose subject can be found in another clause. For example:
As you can see, there is no subject in the first clause. The subject (China’s One Child Policy) appears at the beginning of the following clause. This could have been rewritten:
Thus, this participle clause has helped us combine two simple sentences into one complex sentence. This is the main reason for using a participle clause.
The most important thing to note is that the subject of both clauses should only appear once. It is the subject of both verbs even though it won’t appear in front of the verb in the participle clause. For example:
The two verbs (angered, are turning) apply to the same subject (many voters). We could have re-written this as:
However, this would be repetitive. To express these ideas in a more economical way, we can use a participle clause.
There are three types of participle clause: past, present, and perfect. These refer to the type of participle used.
A present participle is a verb that has been put into the -ing form: walking, dancing, running, eating, cooking, fixing, etc.
Here, the present participle was “running” and the subject was “the little girl.” This is more efficient than saying:
Here are some more examples:
A past participle clause includes the past participle form of a verb. For example: walked, run, eaten, cooked, fixed, etc.
This could also be written:
Note that we don’t necessarily need the participle to be the first word in the clause. In this case, the verb is preceded by an adverb.
Here are some more examples:
These clauses use perfect participles, such as having walked, having run, having eaten, having cooked, having fixed, etc. For example:
Here, the subject was “he.” This could be re-written:
More examples:
Participle clauses are generally quite formal and using them in spoken English can sound a little pretentious. Likewise, if you use them too often in your written work, it can sound strange and even slightly archaic. A good writer will incorporate them sparingly, using them for effect. As I have said, their primary purpose is to make writing economical by removing unnecessary parts.
Not all sentences can be reduced to a participle clause and you still need to observe the grammatical requirements of the main clause.
You can see that all of my examples above put the participle clause before the main clause. This is most common but it is also possible to put the participle clause after the main clause.
To take a previous example, we can invert this sentence:
The meaning is basically the same.
We commonly use participle clauses with conjunctions or prepositions at the start. For example:
Notice that all these examples use the present participle form. It is uncommon to find examples using the past or perfect forms.
Let’s now look at some examples that might appear in an IELTS essay.
Question:
Many criminals commit crimes shortly after being released from prison.
What are the causes of this problem?
What are some solutions?
An essay in response to this question might contain the following sentences:
Note that in the final example I said “knowing.” The verb “know” is considered non-continuous and so we seldom use it with an “-ing” ending. However, with participle clauses you can add “-ing” to non-continuous verbs:
Finally, let’s look at a common mistake called a dangling participle. By now, you will have seen that a participle clause should take the subject that appears in the main clause of the sentence. Put simply, a dangling participle is when the subject of the main clause is not the subject of the participle clause. For example:
In the first sentence, the subject (people) was not right for the participle clause. It was not people who caused pollution here. It was cars. To fix this, we should make “cars” into the subject of both clauses.
I've been teaching IELTS since 2010 and I've marked many thousands of essays as part…
I'm finally making videos again after a very long absence from YouTube! I hardly made…
In today’s grammar lesson, I want to show you how to make lists. I don’t…
I just posted a new video on my YouTube channel. This one is about comma…
I have given lessons on sentence types before on this website because it's such an…
In the IELTS exam, you could be asked a question related to health and for…
View Comments
I would call this type of phrase participle phrase, not participle clause because there is no subject in it. Besides, this post is not comprehensive on the participle phrase. It only mentions non-defining participle phrase but fails to address the defining one.