Today, we are going to take a quick look at an important part of English grammar. It is the phrase “should have,” which can be shortened to “should’ve.” It’s an extremely useful construction for talking about the past and specifically about regrets.
There are two ways to use this structure:
As you can see, the latter is an abbreviation (meaning a shortened version). It is more common in speech and informal writing (such as social media posts, blogs, e-mails to friends, and instant messages).
Whenever we say “should have” or “should’ve,” we follow it with the past participle form of the main verb. For example:
Here, the main verb is “to study” but the past participle form is “studied.”
Let’s think about that example sentence again:
When someone says this, we know two things:
In other words, we use “should have” to talk about things that didn’t happen in the past but that we wish had happened.
Here are some more examples:
This person didn’t buy insurance but wishes they did (probably because they now need it).
She didn’t listen and presumably something bad has happened that meant she regrets not doing so.
He didn’t bring an umbrella and it is likely now raining, so he will regret his choice.
The opposite of “should have” is “should not have.” Again, there are two versions:
Actually, if you want to get really informal, there is a third:
It’s a little strange to see two apostrophes in one word, but we do tend to abbreviate this phrase in common speech, so it makes sense.
We use “should not have” to show that something did happen and that we regret it. For example:
This person has eaten too much and they feel bad about it.
This person has spoken rudely and it was the wrong thing to do.
As I mentioned above, there are two ways to say this:
As such, if you use this structure in the writing test, you should use “should have” because you need to avoid abbreviated forms and other types of informal language.
For the speaking test, however, “should’ve” would be perfectly fine because we can use conversational (ie informal) language here.
It is possible that you could use “should have” in the writing test when talking about issues relating to the environment. Let’s say you were asked about the damage humans have done to the world. You might say:
Here, we have used the formal version:
It is more likely, however, that this sort of language would be needed in the speaking test because it is often used in a personal sense. For example, if you were asked about your childhood, you could say:
This is really the most common use of “should have” (or “should’ve”). I think there are many ways that you could incorporate it into the speaking test and if you can use it well, then it could definitely show the examiner that you have a good grasp of grammar.
Note that this article has been about “should have + past participle,” meaning a regret for something that didn’t happen in the past.
However, there is another use that we have not focused on today and that is simply “should” as a modal verb and then “have” as a regular verb. For example:
In this situation, we cannot abbreviate “should have” to “should’ve.”
This is comparatively straightforward and is quite different to the grammar discussed above, so I will not go into any more detail here, but if you have any questions then please leave them as comments below.
I've been teaching IELTS since 2010 and I've marked many thousands of essays as part…
I'm finally making videos again after a very long absence from YouTube! I hardly made…
In today’s grammar lesson, I want to show you how to make lists. I don’t…
I just posted a new video on my YouTube channel. This one is about comma…
I have given lessons on sentence types before on this website because it's such an…
In the IELTS exam, you could be asked a question related to health and for…